[Rockhounds] New name for a Canadian town called Asbestos

Mike Flannigan mikeflan at att.net
Tue Oct 20 14:46:31 PDT 2020


Looks like you are right-on about the naming:
https://www.mindat.org/min-3975.html


Regarding what mineral(s) they were mining to make
the asbestos:
https://www.mindat.org/loc-581.html

Collectors at work:
https://www.mindat.org/photo-740360.html


Mike



On 10/20/20 10:42 AM, rockhounds-request at rockhounds.drizzle.com wrote:
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:42:19 -0500
> From: Doug Bank<dougbank at alum.mit.edu>
> To: "Rockhounds at drizzle.com: A mailing list for rock and gem
> 	collectors"	<rockhounds at rockhounds.drizzle.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rockhounds] New name for a Canadian town called Asbestos
> Message-ID:<8B1FF538-A1E4-4499-8B9B-C5D66788D714 at alum.mit.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=utf-8
>
> I can?t tell if this is sarcasm or if you are being serious. They absolutely keep changing mineral names!
>
> Some of the minerals found in Talcville and Balmat in New York State are anthophyllite, tremolite and clino-suenoite. However, these minerals seem to change names frequently. At the very least, clino-seunoite used to be manganocummingtonite which used to be tirodite and which might be the same as parvowinchite.  Between 2010 and 2020, I think it changed names twice, which doesn?t help any of the labels in my collection.
>
> I?d say it was a PITA, but it is even worse, because there is no good way to differentiate between all these without doing a chemical analysis, and I can tell that the few specimens I did buy that have labels are not labelled correctly in the first place.
>
> I?m sure this is far from the only example of this kind of confusion.
>
> Doug




More information about the Rockhounds mailing list